Comments on: Bush Doctrine:Charles Gibson Interview With Sarah Palin http://news.spreadit.org/bush-doctrinecharles-gibson-interview-with-sarah-palin/ If it's hot,we will spread it. Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:13:27 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: marg422 http://news.spreadit.org/bush-doctrinecharles-gibson-interview-with-sarah-palin/comment-page-1/#comment-1852 marg422 Fri, 12 Sep 2008 22:07:08 +0000 http://news.spreadit.org/?p=1062#comment-1852 What really got me was how he demeaned her experience and insulted her small town, and "sparsley" populated state. As I see it she's manged more people that the community organizer. Also, even if she had no clue what the question was about, she handled herself with class and strengh. No stuttering. hmmm. Liberals should be scared of Palin. What really got me was how he demeaned her experience and insulted her small town, and “sparsley” populated state. As I see it she’s manged more people that the community organizer. Also, even if she had no clue what the question was about, she handled herself with class and strengh. No stuttering. hmmm. Liberals should be scared of Palin.

]]> By: Joel http://news.spreadit.org/bush-doctrinecharles-gibson-interview-with-sarah-palin/comment-page-1/#comment-1845 Joel Fri, 12 Sep 2008 20:16:40 +0000 http://news.spreadit.org/?p=1062#comment-1845 John Decker, you just proved who the parrots really are. As the "real" news services have already pointed out even Charlie Gibson himself disagreed with.. himself.. what the Bush Doctrine is. Simply Google "Charlie Gibson 2001 Bush doctrine" or something similar and you'll find plenty of research done to highlight what the "press" including Gibson defining the Bush Doctrine originally. None if it matched what Gibson said during Palin's interview. Palin got it exactly right, proving she's ready for the job. It's almost sad a lady from small town Alaska knows more than the ABC anchorman, and his stooges that pretend to blog, John. John Decker, you just proved who the parrots really are. As the “real” news services have already pointed out even Charlie Gibson himself disagreed with.. himself.. what the Bush Doctrine is. Simply Google “Charlie Gibson 2001 Bush doctrine” or something similar and you’ll find plenty of research done to highlight what the “press” including Gibson defining the Bush Doctrine originally. None if it matched what Gibson said during Palin’s interview. Palin got it exactly right, proving she’s ready for the job.

It’s almost sad a lady from small town Alaska knows more than the ABC anchorman, and his stooges that pretend to blog, John.

]]> By: Ed Rae http://news.spreadit.org/bush-doctrinecharles-gibson-interview-with-sarah-palin/comment-page-1/#comment-1829 Ed Rae Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:50:54 +0000 http://news.spreadit.org/?p=1062#comment-1829 While it seems true that Palin did not know what the Bush doctrine was, what is also clear is that Gibson (and an awful lot of internet bloggers) also have no idea what the Bush Doctrine is (and what International Law is). As far as what International Law is, at least as far back as Hugo Grotius in “On the Rights of War and Peace” (1625), at Book 2, Chapter, 1, Section 5, pre-emptive war was justified if the threat was clear and imminent. That was exactly the position Palin advocated. If that’s all the Bush doctrine was, then the Bush Doctrine would be nothing new (pre-emptive strikes being used by other nations at least as far back as by Scotland in the Bishops’ Wars of 1639-1640 and in the last century by Israel in the Six Days War of 1967). What was supposed to be new about the Bush doctrine is that the threat did NOT have to be imminent (Iraq may have been thought to be a threat to attack the U.S. down the road, but it was not a threat to attack the U.S. at the time of the invasion). If anyone should be getting criticized, it's Charlie Gibson and those internet bloggers who were so unprepared and uninformed that in spite of being able to prepare in advance (Gibson) or after the fact (bloggers) they still can’t accurately explain what the Bush Doctrine is. While it seems true that Palin did not know what the Bush doctrine was, what is also clear is that Gibson (and an awful lot of internet bloggers) also have no idea what the Bush Doctrine is (and what International Law is).

As far as what International Law is, at least as far back as Hugo Grotius in “On the Rights of War and Peace” (1625), at Book 2, Chapter, 1, Section 5, pre-emptive war was justified if the threat was clear and imminent. That was exactly the position Palin advocated. If that’s all the Bush doctrine was, then the Bush Doctrine would be nothing new (pre-emptive strikes being used by other nations at least as far back as by Scotland in the Bishops’ Wars of 1639-1640 and in the last century by Israel in the Six Days War of 1967).

What was supposed to be new about the Bush doctrine is that the threat did NOT have to be imminent (Iraq may have been thought to be a threat to attack the U.S. down the road, but it was not a threat to attack the U.S. at the time of the invasion).

If anyone should be getting criticized, it’s Charlie Gibson and those internet bloggers who were so unprepared and uninformed that in spite of being able to prepare in advance (Gibson) or after the fact (bloggers) they still can’t accurately explain what the Bush Doctrine is.

]]> By: hunter http://news.spreadit.org/bush-doctrinecharles-gibson-interview-with-sarah-palin/comment-page-1/#comment-1825 hunter Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:25:45 +0000 http://news.spreadit.org/?p=1062#comment-1825 Clearly Charlie was in over his head. He did not want the answer she gave, and he is not apparently comfortable with a woman who thinks. Gibson seems to be OK asking pressing questions and using phony quotes against women, but when it comes to Obama, he only asks softball questions and accepts answers at face value. No wonder Republicans tend to be tougher than democrats. They do not live in an echo chamber. Obama could not even go on Fox without preconditions assuring him of easy questions. And still, the democrats are running against the VP. Sort of a tacit admission that they know their guy is not really ready to be President. Do you know what the shortest book in the world is? "The Accomplishments of Barak Hussein Obama" Clearly Charlie was in over his head.
He did not want the answer she gave, and he is not apparently comfortable with a woman who thinks.
Gibson seems to be OK asking pressing questions and using phony quotes against women, but when it comes to Obama, he only asks softball questions and accepts answers at face value.
No wonder Republicans tend to be tougher than democrats. They do not live in an echo chamber.
Obama could not even go on Fox without preconditions assuring him of easy questions.
And still, the democrats are running against the VP. Sort of a tacit admission that they know their guy is not really ready to be President.
Do you know what the shortest book in the world is?
“The Accomplishments of Barak Hussein Obama”

]]> By: Mary http://news.spreadit.org/bush-doctrinecharles-gibson-interview-with-sarah-palin/comment-page-1/#comment-1805 Mary Fri, 12 Sep 2008 04:00:29 +0000 http://news.spreadit.org/?p=1062#comment-1805 This is a dangerous woman and after tonight's interview with Charlie Gibson, I am afraid of what America will become if she gets into Our White House.... Scary! Scary! Scary! Think about it people. A daughter 17 expecting a baby, a shotgun wedding, a son going to Iraq to stay out of jail... and still more to come. Let's put our parties aside and think about what's best for America. With John Mccain and Palin, four more years of the same! This is a dangerous woman and after tonight’s interview with Charlie Gibson, I am afraid of what America will become if she gets into Our White House…. Scary! Scary! Scary! Think about it people. A daughter 17 expecting a baby, a shotgun wedding, a son going to Iraq to stay out of jail… and still more to come. Let’s put our parties aside and think about what’s best for America. With John Mccain and Palin, four more years of the same!

]]> By: jason http://news.spreadit.org/bush-doctrinecharles-gibson-interview-with-sarah-palin/comment-page-1/#comment-1801 jason Fri, 12 Sep 2008 03:30:20 +0000 http://news.spreadit.org/?p=1062#comment-1801 f you were ever wondering ​what the next four years be like with MCDADDy AND HIS PUPPET get elected, please click on the link bleow. i hope you enjoy​ the reality of the next 4year​s with MCDADDY and his puppe​t get elect​ed!​!​!​ http:​/​/​www.​ youtu​be.​ com/​watch​?​v=​CWuuX​peqNN​w f you were ever wondering ​what the next four years be like with MCDADDy AND HIS PUPPET get elected, please click on the link bleow. i hope you enjoy​ the reality of the next 4year​s with MCDADDY and his puppe​t get elect​ed!​!​!​

http:​/​/​www.​ youtu​be.​ com/​watch​?​v=​CWuuX​peqNN​w

]]> By: John Decker http://news.spreadit.org/bush-doctrinecharles-gibson-interview-with-sarah-palin/comment-page-1/#comment-1789 John Decker Fri, 12 Sep 2008 01:25:38 +0000 http://news.spreadit.org/?p=1062#comment-1789 Ted, how do you give an A+ to someone who, when asked a question, has no idea what the question means? Palin was like a deer caught in the headlights of an oncoming car. How many time did Gibson have to repeat questions just to get a simple answer? The problem was, Palin's rehearsal team couldn't prepare her for everything and Palin has no ability whatsoever to think on her feet. She's a parrot, at best, and you know what happens to parrots when their owners get tired of the same line over and over again? Bye bye, parrot. Ted, how do you give an A+ to someone who, when asked a question, has no idea what the question means?

Palin was like a deer caught in the headlights of an oncoming car. How many time did Gibson have to repeat questions just to get a simple answer?

The problem was, Palin’s rehearsal team couldn’t prepare her for everything and Palin has no ability whatsoever to think on her feet. She’s a parrot, at best, and you know what happens to parrots when their owners get tired of the same line over and over again?

Bye bye, parrot.

]]> By: Ted http://news.spreadit.org/bush-doctrinecharles-gibson-interview-with-sarah-palin/comment-page-1/#comment-1788 Ted Fri, 12 Sep 2008 00:28:09 +0000 http://news.spreadit.org/?p=1062#comment-1788 Sarah Palin Interview Grade A+ (for Sarah that is, not Charlie) Sarah Palin Interview Grade A+ (for Sarah that is, not Charlie)

]]>